What Sources Can You Use For A Literature Review?

What makes a good literature review?

A good review does not just summarize the literature, but discusses it critically, identifies methodological problems, and points out research gaps [19].

After having read a review of the literature, a reader should have a rough idea of: the major achievements in the reviewed field, …

the outstanding research questions..

How old should sources be in a literature review?

A good rule of thumb is to use sources published in the past 10 years for research in the arts, humanities, literature, history, etc.

How do you begin a literature review?

One common way to approach a literature review is to start out broad and then become more specific. Think of it as an inverted triangle: First briefly explain the broad issues related to your investigation; you don’t need to write much about this, just demonstrate that you are aware of the breadth of your subject.

What is literature review sample?

1. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources that provides an overview of a particular topic. It generally follows a discussion of the paper’s thesis statement or the study’s goals or purpose. *This sample paper was adapted by the Writing Center from Key, K.L., Rich, C., DeCristofaro, C., Collins, S.

How many sources should you use in a literature review?

Example: A paper that has 10 pages of content (the body of the paper) needs at least 10 sources in its literature review. A thesis of 100 pages (in the body) includes at least 100 sources.

What are the five sources of literature review?

When we talk about information sources for a literature review in education or nursing, we generally mean these five areas: the internet, reference material and other books, empirical or evidence-based articles in scholarly, peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings and papers, dissertations and theses, and grey …

What are the three types of sources for a literature review?

In general, there are three types of resources or sources of information: primary, secondary, and tertiary.

What makes a bad literature review?

A Poor Literature Review simply summarizes research findings without critical evaluation. … A Poor Literature Review is boring or obtuse because of the overuse of jargon and pretentious language and the lack of organization. A Good Literature Review presents research evidence in a meaningful chronological order.

What sources are not appropriate for a literature review?

“Non-scholarly” sources, i.e., those you don’t want to reference, include but are not limited to magazines, newspapers, web sites, and non-published material. The Lit Review does not have to be exhaustive; the objective is not to list as many relevant books, articles, and reports as possible.

What makes a strong literature review?

A good literature review will not only summarize the information, but also point out weaknesses in the experimental procedures as well as possible theoretical conflicts. It builds on the current knowledge by identifying gaps in the available literature and suggesting future directions for research.

Do you give your own opinion in a literature review?

Again, for the same reasons you do not use emotional phrases in a literature review, you also don’t insert your own personal opinions. The literature review is supposed to be an unbiased display of already-existing thought and research around your topic. It is supposed to be objective, never subjective.